MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
🏍️ Garage

Ducati Monster 797 vs KTM 690 Duke

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
Monster 797
59
/100 Β· Balanced
690 Duke
63
/100 Β· Sporty
πŸ”₯ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
🧍 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for Monster 797 vs 690 Duke using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Ducati Monster 797 (2017) KTM 690 Duke (2018)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE 690 Duke Power: 58/100 (73 HP) 690 Duke Torque: 68/100 (74 Nm) 690 Duke Agility: 81/100 (149 kg dry) 690 Duke Ergonomics: 62/100 (835 mm) 690 Duke Range: 69/100 (~316 km (14L)) Monster 797 Power: 59/100 (75 HP) Monster 797 Torque: 65/100 (68.9 Nm) Monster 797 Agility: 70/100 (175 kg dry) Monster 797 Ergonomics: 68/100 (785 mm) Monster 797 Range: 68/100 (~311 km (16.5L))
59/100 (75 HP) Power (73 HP) 58/100
65/100 (68.9 Nm) Torque (74 Nm) 68/100
70/100 (175 kg dry) Agility (149 kg dry) 81/100
68/100 (785 mm) Ergonomics (835 mm) 62/100
68/100 (~311 km (16.5L)) Range (~316 km (14L)) 69/100
Key Insights
B 690 Duke scores higher overall (63 vs 59)
A Monster 797 produces more power (75 HP vs 73 HP)
B 690 Duke is lighter (148.5 kg vs 175 kg dry) β€” easier to handle
B 690 Duke has better power-to-weight ratio (0.492 vs 0.429 hp/kg dry)
Spec Ducati Monster 797
2017
KTM 690 Duke
2018
Category Naked bike Naked bike
Year 2017 2018
Displacement 803.0 ccm (49.00 cubic inches) βœ“ 690.0 ccm (42.10 cubic inches)
Power 75.0 HP (54.7 kW) @ 8250 RPM βœ“ 73.0 HP (53.3 kW)
Torque 68.9 Nm (7.0 kgf-m or 50.8 ft.lbs) @ 5750 RPM 74.0 Nm (7.5 kgf-m or 54.6 ft.lbs) βœ“
Gearbox 6-speed 6-speed
Final Drive Chain (final drive) Chain (final drive)
Front Suspension 43 mm Kayaba USD fork WP upside-down Ø 43 mm
Rear Suspension Sachs monoshock, pre-load and rebound adjustable WP shock absorber with Pro-Lever linkage
Front Tyre 120/70-ZR17 120/70-17
Rear Tyre 180/55-ZR17 160/60-17
Front Brakes Double disc. Semi-floating discs, radially mounted Monobloc Brembo M4-32 callipers, 4-pistons, axiial pump with ABS as standard Single disc. ABS. Brembo. Floating disc. Four-piston calipers. Radially mounted.
Rear Brakes Single disc. 2-piston floating calliper with ABS as standard equipment Single disc. ABS. Brembo. Floating disc. Single-piston caliper.
Dry Weight 175.0 kg (385.8 pounds) 148.5 kg (327.4 pounds) βœ“
Wet Weight 193.0 kg (425.5 pounds) β€”
Power/Weight 0.4286 HP/kg 0.4916 HP/kg βœ“
Seat Height 785 mm (30.9 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 835 mm (32.9 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity 16.50 litres (4.36 US gallons) βœ“ 14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons)
Oil Capacity 3.40 litres (3.59 US quarts) 1.70 litres (1.80 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1480 mm (58.3 inches) 1466 mm (57.7 inches)
Ground Clearance β€” 192 mm (7.6 inches)
Engine Oil Shell Advance 4T Ultra SAE 15W-50 Synthetic (JASO MA2 / API SN) SAE 10W-40 Synthetic 4T (API SL/SN / JASO MA2)
Spark Plugs NGK MAR9A-J / DCPR8E NGK CR8E / CR9E /CR9EH-9
Battery 12V 10Ah sealed maintenance-free (YT12B-BS) 12V 10Ah / 12Ah (YTX9-BS / YTX12-BS / YT12A-BS)
Front Tire Pressure 2.3 bar (33 psi) 2.3 bar (33 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure 2.5 bar (36 psi) 2.5 bar (36 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 – 835 mm (30.7″ – 32.9″) 165 – 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 – 840 mm (29.7″ – 33.1″) 235 – 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 – 720 mm (25.5″ – 28.3″) 220 – 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 – 815 mm (30.5″ – 32.1″) 168 – 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650–720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811–1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
🏠 Home πŸ” All Bikes ⚑ Rider Tools & Simulators 🏍️ My Garage πŸ“‚ Categories βš–οΈ Compare πŸŽ›οΈ Advanced Filter 🎯 Bike Finder 🎬 Videos πŸ“° Blog πŸ“– Glossary ℹ️ About

πŸͺ We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

βš–οΈ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification