MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
🏍️ Garage

Kawasaki Z900 vs Ducati Monster 1200

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
Z900
71
/100 Β· Sporty
Monster 1200
77
/100 Β· High Performance
πŸ”₯ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
🧍 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for Z900 vs Monster 1200 using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Kawasaki Z900 (2017) Ducati Monster 1200 (2018)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE Monster 1200 Power: 80/100 (135 HP) Monster 1200 Torque: 86/100 (118 Nm) Monster 1200 Agility: 65/100 (182 kg dry) Monster 1200 Ergonomics: 68/100 (785 mm) Monster 1200 Range: 62/100 (~289 km (17.5L)) Z900 Power: 77/100 (125 HP) Z900 Torque: 78/100 (98.6 Nm) Z900 Agility: 65/100 (210 kg) Z900 Ergonomics: 66/100 (795 mm) Z900 Range: 67/100 (~309 km (17L))
77/100 (125 HP) Power (135 HP) 80/100
78/100 (98.6 Nm) Torque (118 Nm) 86/100
65/100 (210 kg) Agility (182 kg dry) 65/100
66/100 (795 mm) Ergonomics (785 mm) 68/100
67/100 (~309 km (17L)) Range (~289 km (17.5L)) 62/100
Key Insights
B Monster 1200 scores higher overall (77 vs 71)
B Monster 1200 produces more power (135 HP vs 125 HP)
B Monster 1200 is lighter (209 kg vs 210 kg wet) β€” easier to handle
B Monster 1200 has better power-to-weight ratio (0.646 vs 0.595 hp/kg wet)
Spec Kawasaki Z900
2017
Ducati Monster 1200
2018
Category Naked bike Naked bike
Year 2017 2018
Displacement 948.0 ccm (57.85 cubic inches) 1198.4 ccm (73.13 cubic inches) βœ“
Power 125.0 HP (91.2 kW) @ 9500 RPM 135.0 HP (98.5 kW) @ 8750 RPM βœ“
Torque 98.6 Nm (10.1 kgf-m or 72.7 ft.lbs) @ 7700 RPM 118.0 Nm (12.0 kgf-m or 87.0 ft.lbs) @ 7250 RPM βœ“
Gearbox 6-speed 6-speed
Final Drive Chain (final drive) Chain (final drive)
Front Suspension 41 mm inverted fork with compression and rebound damping and spring preload adjustability 43mm fully adjustable usd forks
Rear Suspension Horizontal Back-link with rebound damping and spring preload adjustability Progressive linkage with fully adjustable monoshock. Aluminium single-sided swingarm
Front Tyre 120/70-ZR17 120/70-ZR17
Rear Tyre 180/55-ZR17 190/55-ZR17
Front Brakes Double disc. Floating discs. Double disc. ABS. Floating discs. Four-piston calipers. Radially mounted.
Rear Brakes Single disc Single disc. ABS. Floating disc. Two-piston calipers.
Dry Weight β€” 182.0 kg (401.2 pounds)
Wet Weight 210.0 kg (463.0 pounds) 209.0 kg (460.8 pounds) βœ“
Power/Weight 0.5896 HP/kg 0.7418 HP/kg βœ“
Seat Height 795 mm (31.3 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 785 mm (30.9 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity 17.00 litres (4.49 US gallons) 17.50 litres (4.62 US gallons) βœ“
Oil Capacity 3.60 litres (3.80 US quarts) 3.40 litres (3.59 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1450 mm (57.1 inches) 1511 mm (59.5 inches)
Ground Clearance 130 mm (5.1 inches) β€”
Engine Oil SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2) Shell Advance 4T Ultra SAE 15W-50 Synthetic (JASO MA2 / API SN)
Spark Plugs NGK CR9E /CR9EIA-9 / DPR8EA-9 NGK MAR9A-J / DCPR8E
Battery 12V 12Ah / 14Ah (YTX12-BS / YTX14-BS / YTZ14S) 12V 10Ah sealed maintenance-free (YT12B-BS)
Front Tire Pressure 2.5 bar (36 psi) 2.3 bar (33 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure 2.9 bar (42 psi) 2.5 bar (36 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 – 835 mm (30.7″ – 32.9″) 165 – 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 – 840 mm (29.7″ – 33.1″) 235 – 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 – 720 mm (25.5″ – 28.3″) 220 – 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 – 815 mm (30.5″ – 32.1″) 168 – 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650–720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811–1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
🏠 Home πŸ” All Bikes ⚑ Rider Tools & Simulators 🏍️ My Garage πŸ“‚ Categories βš–οΈ Compare πŸŽ›οΈ Advanced Filter 🎯 Bike Finder 🎬 Videos πŸ“° Blog πŸ“– Glossary ℹ️ About

πŸͺ We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

βš–οΈ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification