MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
🏍️ Garage

Moto Guzzi Audace Carbon vs Harley-Davidson Night Rod Special

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
Audace Carbon
66
/100 Β· Sporty
Night Rod Special
67
/100 Β· Sporty
πŸ”₯ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
🧍 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for Audace Carbon vs Night Rod Special using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Moto Guzzi Audace Carbon (2017) Harley-Davidson Night Rod Special (2017)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE Night Rod Special Power: 75/100 (120.7 HP) Night Rod Special Torque: 83/100 (111 Nm) Night Rod Special Agility: 32/100 (289 kg dry) Night Rod Special Ergonomics: 89/100 (675 mm) Night Rod Special Range: 64/100 (~298 km (18.9L)) Audace Carbon Power: 67/100 (96 HP) Audace Carbon Torque: 87/100 (121 Nm) Audace Carbon Agility: 32/100 (299 kg) Audace Carbon Ergonomics: 74/100 (740 mm) Audace Carbon Range: 67/100 (~308 km (20.5L))
67/100 (96 HP) Power (120.7 HP) 75/100
87/100 (121 Nm) Torque (111 Nm) 83/100
32/100 (299 kg) Agility (289 kg dry) 32/100
74/100 (740 mm) Ergonomics (675 mm) 89/100
67/100 (~308 km (20.5L)) Range (~298 km (18.9L)) 64/100
Key Insights
B Night Rod Special scores higher overall (67 vs 66)
B Night Rod Special produces more power (120.7 HP vs 96 HP)
A Audace Carbon is lighter (299 kg vs 302 kg wet) β€” easier to handle
B Night Rod Special has better power-to-weight ratio (0.4 vs 0.321 hp/kg wet)
Spec Moto Guzzi Audace Carbon
2017
Harley-Davidson Night Rod Special
2017
Category Naked bike Naked bike
Year 2017 2017
Displacement 1380.0 ccm (84.21 cubic inches) βœ“ 1247.0 ccm (76.09 cubic inches)
Power 96.0 HP (70.1 kW) @ 6500 RPM 120.7 HP (88.1 kW) @ 8000 RPM βœ“
Torque 121.0 Nm (12.3 kgf-m or 89.2 ft.lbs) @ 3000 RPM βœ“ 111.0 Nm (11.3 kgf-m or 81.9 ft.lbs) @ 7250 RPM
Gearbox 6-speed 6-speed
Final Drive Shaft drive (cardan) (final drive) Belt (final drive)
Front Suspension Standard swingarm 46 mm, with radical calliper mountain bracket and telescopes on the stanchions Inverted fork
Rear Suspension Swingarm with double shock absorber adjustable spring preload β€”
Front Tyre 100/90-18 120/70-ZR19
Rear Tyre 200/60-16 240/40-R18
Front Brakes Double disc. ABS. Floating discs. Brembo. Double disc. ABS. 4-piston
Rear Brakes Single disc. ABS. Floating disc. Brembo. Single disc. ABS. 4-piston
Dry Weight β€” 289.0 kg (637.1 pounds)
Wet Weight 299.0 kg (659.2 pounds) βœ“ 302.0 kg (665.8 pounds)
Power/Weight β€” 0.4176 HP/kg
Seat Height 740 mm (29.1 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 675 mm (26.6 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity 20.50 litres (5.42 US gallons) βœ“ 18.93 litres (5.00 US gallons)
Oil Capacity 3.50 litres (3.70 US quarts) 4.70 litres (4.97 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1695 mm (66.7 inches) 1705 mm (67.1 inches)
Ground Clearance β€” 115 mm (4.5 inches)
Engine Oil SAE 10W-60 Synthetic 4T (API SG/SN / JASO MA2) SAE 20W-50 V-Twin Synthetic/Mineral motorcycle oil
Spark Plugs NGK BPR6ES / CPR8EB-9 HD 6R12 / Champion RA8HC / NGK DCPR7E
Battery 12V 14Ah / 18Ah (YTX14-BS / YTX20CH-BS) 12V 19Ah / 28Ah AGM (YTX20HL-BS / YIX30L-BS)
Front Tire Pressure 2.4 bar (35 psi) 2.5 bar (36 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure 2.6 bar (38 psi) 2.8 bar (40 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 – 835 mm (30.7″ – 32.9″) 165 – 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 – 840 mm (29.7″ – 33.1″) 235 – 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 – 720 mm (25.5″ – 28.3″) 220 – 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 – 815 mm (30.5″ – 32.1″) 168 – 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650–720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811–1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
🏠 Home πŸ” All Bikes ⚑ Rider Tools & Simulators 🏍️ My Garage πŸ“‚ Categories βš–οΈ Compare πŸŽ›οΈ Advanced Filter 🎯 Bike Finder 🎬 Videos πŸ“° Blog πŸ“– Glossary ℹ️ About

πŸͺ We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

βš–οΈ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification