MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
๐Ÿ๏ธ Garage

Rieju RS2 Pro Matrix vs Yamaha YZF-R3

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
RS2 Pro Matrix
32
/100 ยท Commuter
YZF-R3
45
/100 ยท Balanced
๐Ÿ”ฅ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
๐Ÿง 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for RS2 Pro Matrix vs YZF-R3 using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Rieju RS2 Pro Matrix (2006) Yamaha YZF-R3 (2018)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE YZF-R3 Power: 44/100 (42 HP) YZF-R3 Torque: 43/100 (29.6 Nm) YZF-R3 Agility: 82/100 (167 kg) YZF-R3 Ergonomics: 70/100 (780 mm) YZF-R3 Range: 73/100 (~333 km (14L)) RS2 Pro Matrix Power: 24/100 (50 cc) RS2 Pro Matrix Torque: 24/100 (~8 Nm) RS2 Pro Matrix Agility: 98/100 (110 kg dry) RS2 Pro Matrix Ergonomics: 70/100 (800 mm) RS2 Pro Matrix Range: 58/100 (Standard)
24/100 (50 cc) Power (42 HP) 44/100
24/100 (~8 Nm) Torque (29.6 Nm) 43/100
98/100 (110 kg dry) Agility (167 kg) 82/100
70/100 (800 mm) Ergonomics (780 mm) 70/100
58/100 (Standard) Range (~333 km (14L)) 73/100
Key Insights
B YZF-R3 scores higher overall (45 vs 32)
Spec Rieju RS2 Pro Matrix
2006
Yamaha YZF-R3
2018
Category Sport Sport
Year 2006 2018
Displacement 50.0 ccm (3.05 cubic inches) 321.0 ccm (19.59 cubic inches) โœ“
Power โ€” 42.0 HP (30.7 kW) @ 10750 RPM
Torque โ€” 29.6 Nm (3.0 kgf-m or 21.8 ft.lbs) @ 9000 RPM
Gearbox 6-speed 6-speed
Final Drive โ€” Chain (final drive)
Front Suspension Upside-Down Hydraulic Fork ร˜ 35 mm. SHOWA 41mm KYBยฎ telescopic fork
Rear Suspension Mono shock absorber KYBยฎ single shock, adjustable preload
Front Tyre 100/80-17 110/70-17
Rear Tyre 130/70-17 140/70-17
Front Brakes Single disc. Double piston Single disc. Optional ABS.
Rear Brakes Single disc Single disc. Optional ABS.
Dry Weight 109.5 kg (241.4 pounds) โ€”
Wet Weight โ€” 166.9 kg (368.0 pounds)
Seat Height 800 mm (31.5 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 780 mm (30.7 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity โ€” 14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons)
Oil Capacity 1.30 litres 2T reservoir / 0.80 L gearbox 2.60 litres (2.75 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1300 mm (51.2 inches) 1379 mm (54.3 inches)
Ground Clearance โ€” 160 mm (6.3 inches)
Engine Oil 2-stroke synthetic motorcycle oil (API TC / JASO FC/FD) SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2)
Spark Plugs NGK BR9ES / BR9EG NGK CR8E / CR9E
Battery 12V 4Ah (YTX4L-BS) 12V 7Ah / 9Ah (YTX7L-BS / YTX9-BS)
Front Tire Pressure โ€” 2.0 bar (29 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure โ€” 2.2 bar (32 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 โ€“ 835 mm (30.7″ โ€“ 32.9″) 165 โ€“ 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 โ€“ 840 mm (29.7″ โ€“ 33.1″) 235 โ€“ 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 โ€“ 720 mm (25.5″ โ€“ 28.3″) 220 โ€“ 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 โ€“ 815 mm (30.5″ โ€“ 32.1″) 168 โ€“ 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650โ€“720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811โ€“1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
๐Ÿ  Home ๐Ÿ” All Bikes โšก Rider Tools & Simulators ๐Ÿ๏ธ My Garage ๐Ÿ“‚ Categories โš–๏ธ Compare ๐ŸŽ›๏ธ Advanced Filter ๐ŸŽฏ Bike Finder ๐ŸŽฌ Videos ๐Ÿ“ฐ Blog ๐Ÿ“– Glossary โ„น๏ธ About

๐Ÿช We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

โš–๏ธ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification