MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
🏍️ Garage

Triumph Speedmaster vs Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
Speedmaster
54
/100 Β· Balanced
Vulcan 900 Custom
52
/100 Β· Balanced
πŸ”₯ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
🧍 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for Speedmaster vs Vulcan 900 Custom using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Triumph Speedmaster (2016) Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom (2018)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE Vulcan 900 Custom Power: 47/100 (48 HP) Vulcan 900 Custom Torque: 70/100 (78.9 Nm) Vulcan 900 Custom Agility: 39/100 (277 kg) Vulcan 900 Custom Ergonomics: 87/100 (686 mm) Vulcan 900 Custom Range: 87/100 (~392 km (20.1L)) Speedmaster Power: 53/100 (61 HP) Speedmaster Torque: 67/100 (72 Nm) Speedmaster Agility: 48/100 (231 kg dry) Speedmaster Ergonomics: 91/100 (690 mm) Speedmaster Range: 87/100 (~394 km (19.3L))
53/100 (61 HP) Power (48 HP) 47/100
67/100 (72 Nm) Torque (78.9 Nm) 70/100
48/100 (231 kg dry) Agility (277 kg) 39/100
91/100 (690 mm) Ergonomics (686 mm) 87/100
87/100 (~394 km (19.3L)) Range (~392 km (20.1L)) 87/100
Key Insights
A Speedmaster scores higher overall (54 vs 52)
A Speedmaster produces more power (61 HP vs 48 HP)
A Speedmaster is lighter (250 kg vs 277.1 kg wet) β€” easier to handle
A Speedmaster has better power-to-weight ratio (0.244 vs 0.173 hp/kg wet)
Spec Triumph Speedmaster
2016
Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom
2018
Category Custom - Cruiser Custom - Cruiser
Year 2016 2018
Displacement 865.0 ccm (52.78 cubic inches) 903.0 ccm (55.10 cubic inches) βœ“
Power 61.0 HP (44.5 kW) @ 6800 RPM βœ“ 48.0 HP (35.0 kW) @ 5700 RPM
Torque 72.0 Nm (7.3 kgf-m or 53.1 ft.lbs) @ 3300 RPM 78.9 Nm (8.0 kgf-m or 58.2 ft.lbs) @ 3500 RPM βœ“
Gearbox 5-speed 5-speed
Final Drive Chain (final drive) Belt (final drive)
Front Suspension Kayaba 41mm forks with polished lowers. 41mm hydraulic telescopic fork
Rear Suspension KYB chromed spring twin shocks with adjustable preload. Uni-Trak swingarm, 7-way adjustable spring preload
Front Tyre 100/90-R19 80/90-21
Rear Tyre 170/80-B15 180/70-15
Front Brakes Double disc. Nissin 2-piston floating calipers Single disc. Hydraulic.
Rear Brakes Single disc. Nissin 2-piston floating calipers Single disc. Hydraulic.
Dry Weight 231.0 kg (509.3 pounds) β€”
Wet Weight 250.0 kg (551.2 pounds) βœ“ 277.1 kg (610.8 pounds)
Power/Weight 0.2641 HP/kg βœ“ 0.1732 HP/kg
Seat Height 690 mm (27.2 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 686 mm (27.0 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity 19.30 litres (5.10 US gallons) 20.06 litres (5.30 US gallons) βœ“
Oil Capacity 4.50 litres (4.76 US quarts) 3.60 litres (3.80 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1600 mm (63.0 inches) 1646 mm (64.8 inches)
Ground Clearance β€” 140 mm (5.5 inches)
Engine Oil SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2) SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2)
Spark Plugs NGK CR9E /CR9EIA-9 / DPR8EA-9 NGK CR9E /CR9EIA-9 / DPR8EA-9
Battery 12V 12Ah / 14Ah (YTX12-BS / YTX14-BS / YTZ14S) 12V 12Ah / 14Ah (YTX12-BS / YTX14-BS / YTZ14S)
Front Tire Pressure 2.5 bar (36 psi) 2.5 bar (36 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure 2.9 bar (42 psi) 2.9 bar (42 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 – 835 mm (30.7″ – 32.9″) 165 – 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 – 840 mm (29.7″ – 33.1″) 235 – 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 – 720 mm (25.5″ – 28.3″) 220 – 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 – 815 mm (30.5″ – 32.1″) 168 – 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650–720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811–1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
🏠 Home πŸ” All Bikes ⚑ Rider Tools & Simulators 🏍️ My Garage πŸ“‚ Categories βš–οΈ Compare πŸŽ›οΈ Advanced Filter 🎯 Bike Finder 🎬 Videos πŸ“° Blog πŸ“– Glossary ℹ️ About

πŸͺ We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

βš–οΈ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification