MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
🏍️ Garage

Yamaha MT-09 SP vs Ducati Monster 821

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
MT-09 SP
69
/100 Β· Sporty
Monster 821
67
/100 Β· Sporty
πŸ”₯ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
🧍 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for MT-09 SP vs Monster 821 using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Yamaha MT-09 SP (2018) Ducati Monster 821 (2017)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE Monster 821 Power: 72/100 (112 HP) Monster 821 Torque: 74/100 (89.4 Nm) Monster 821 Agility: 66/100 (180 kg dry) Monster 821 Ergonomics: 68/100 (785 mm) Monster 821 Range: 80/100 (~361 km (17.5L)) MT-09 SP Power: 73/100 (113.5 HP) MT-09 SP Torque: 74/100 (87.5 Nm) MT-09 SP Agility: 70/100 (193 kg) MT-09 SP Ergonomics: 60/100 (820 mm) MT-09 SP Range: 54/100 (~255 km (14L))
73/100 (113.5 HP) Power (112 HP) 72/100
74/100 (87.5 Nm) Torque (89.4 Nm) 74/100
70/100 (193 kg) Agility (180 kg dry) 66/100
60/100 (820 mm) Ergonomics (785 mm) 68/100
54/100 (~255 km (14L)) Range (~361 km (17.5L)) 80/100
Key Insights
A MT-09 SP scores higher overall (69 vs 67)
A MT-09 SP produces more power (113.5 HP vs 112 HP)
A MT-09 SP is lighter (193 kg vs 205.5 kg wet) β€” easier to handle
A MT-09 SP has better power-to-weight ratio (0.588 vs 0.545 hp/kg wet)
Spec Yamaha MT-09 SP
2018
Ducati Monster 821
2017
Category Naked bike Naked bike
Year 2018 2017
Displacement 847.0 ccm (51.68 cubic inches) βœ“ 821.0 ccm (50.10 cubic inches)
Power 113.5 HP (82.8 kW) @ 10000 RPM βœ“ 112.0 HP (81.8 kW) @ 9250 RPM
Torque 87.5 Nm (8.9 kgf-m or 64.5 ft.lbs) @ 8900 RPM 89.4 Nm (9.1 kgf-m or 65.9 ft.lbs) @ 7750 RPM βœ“
Gearbox 6-speed 6-speed
Final Drive Chain (final drive) Chain (final drive)
Front Suspension 41mm inverted fork, fully adjustable 43mm upside-down forks
Rear Suspension Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping Progressive linkage with adjustable monoshock. Aluminium double-sided swingarm
Front Tyre 120/70-ZR17 120/70-ZR17
Rear Tyre 180/55-ZR17 180/55-ZR17
Front Brakes Double disc. ABS. Hydraulic. Double disc. Semi-floating discs, radially mounted Monobloc Brembo M4-32 callipers, 4-pistons, axiial pump with ABS as standard
Rear Brakes Single disc. ABS. Hydraulic. Single disc. 2-piston floating calliper with ABS as standard equipment
Dry Weight β€” 179.5 kg (395.7 pounds)
Wet Weight 193.0 kg (425.5 pounds) βœ“ 205.5 kg (453.0 pounds)
Power/Weight β€” 0.6240 HP/kg
Seat Height 820 mm (32.3 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 785 mm (30.9 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity 14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons) 17.50 litres (4.62 US gallons) βœ“
Oil Capacity 3.40 litres (3.59 US quarts) 3.20 litres (3.38 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1500 mm (59.1 inches) 1480 mm (58.3 inches)
Ground Clearance 135 mm (5.3 inches) β€”
Engine Oil SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2) Shell Advance 4T Ultra SAE 15W-50 Synthetic (JASO MA2 / API SN)
Spark Plugs NGK CR9E /CR9EIA-9 / DPR8EA-9 NGK MAR9A-J / DCPR8E
Battery 12V 12Ah / 14Ah (YTX12-BS / YTX14-BS / YTZ14S) 12V 10Ah sealed maintenance-free (YT12B-BS)
Front Tire Pressure 2.5 bar (36 psi) 2.3 bar (33 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure 2.9 bar (42 psi) 2.5 bar (36 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 – 835 mm (30.7″ – 32.9″) 165 – 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 – 840 mm (29.7″ – 33.1″) 235 – 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 – 720 mm (25.5″ – 28.3″) 220 – 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 – 815 mm (30.5″ – 32.1″) 168 – 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650–720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811–1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
🏠 Home πŸ” All Bikes ⚑ Rider Tools & Simulators 🏍️ My Garage πŸ“‚ Categories βš–οΈ Compare πŸŽ›οΈ Advanced Filter 🎯 Bike Finder 🎬 Videos πŸ“° Blog πŸ“– Glossary ℹ️ About

πŸͺ We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

βš–οΈ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification