MotoLibrary MotoLibrary
🏍️ Garage

Yamaha YZF-R1 60th Anniversary vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10RR

Run an instant motorcycle specifications comparison across 44,149+ models. Select any two bikes below to compare engine displacement, horsepower, torque, wet weight, seat height, motorcycle fit, brakes, suspension, and ownership factors side by side.

Engine & Power Specs Seat Height & Motorcycle Fit Sport vs Touring vs Cruiser Weight & Ownership Factors
Bike A
Bike B
YZF-R1 60th Anniversary
89
/100 Β· Exceptional
Ninja ZX-10RR
88
/100 Β· Exceptional
πŸ”₯ Rider Garage Poll
Which motorcycle would you put in your garage?
🧍 2D Ergonomics & Real-World Drag
Compare Riding Posture & Loaded Acceleration

Overlay rider knee angle, torso lean, and traffic-stop foot reach for YZF-R1 60th Anniversary vs Ninja ZX-10RR using your exact height & inseam:

5-Axis Engineering Telemetry

Head-to-Head Character Radar

Yamaha YZF-R1 60th Anniversary (2017) Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10RR (2018)
POWER TORQUE AGILITY ERGONOMICS RANGE Ninja ZX-10RR Power: 97/100 (200 HP) Ninja ZX-10RR Torque: 84/100 (113.5 Nm) Ninja ZX-10RR Agility: 66/100 (206 kg) Ninja ZX-10RR Ergonomics: 57/100 (835 mm) Ninja ZX-10RR Range: 52/100 (~244 km (17L)) YZF-R1 60th Anniversary Power: 97/100 (200 HP) YZF-R1 60th Anniversary Torque: 83/100 (112.4 Nm) YZF-R1 60th Anniversary Agility: 68/100 (199 kg) YZF-R1 60th Anniversary Ergonomics: 52/100 (856 mm) YZF-R1 60th Anniversary Range: 52/100 (~246 km (17L))
97/100 (200 HP) Power (200 HP) 97/100
83/100 (112.4 Nm) Torque (113.5 Nm) 84/100
68/100 (199 kg) Agility (206 kg) 66/100
52/100 (856 mm) Ergonomics (835 mm) 57/100
52/100 (~246 km (17L)) Range (~244 km (17L)) 52/100
Key Insights
A YZF-R1 60th Anniversary scores higher overall (89 vs 88)
A YZF-R1 60th Anniversary is lighter (199 kg vs 206 kg wet) β€” easier to handle
A YZF-R1 60th Anniversary has better power-to-weight ratio (1.005 vs 0.971 hp/kg wet)
Spec Yamaha YZF-R1 60th Anniversary
2017
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10RR
2018
Category Sport Sport
Year 2017 2018
Displacement 998.0 ccm (60.90 cubic inches) 998.0 ccm (60.90 cubic inches)
Power 200.0 HP (146.0 kW) @ 13500 RPM 200.0 HP (146.0 kW) @ 13000 RPM
Torque 112.4 Nm (11.5 kgf-m or 82.9 ft.lbs) @ 11500 RPM 113.5 Nm (11.6 kgf-m or 83.7 ft.lbs) @ 11600 RPM βœ“
Gearbox 6-speed 6-speed
Final Drive Chain (final drive) Chain (final drive)
Front Suspension Telescopic forks, Ø 43 mm 43 mm inverted fork with rebound and compression damping, spring preload adjustability and top-out springs
Rear Suspension Swingarm, (link suspension) Horizontal Back-link with gas-charged shock and top-out spring. Compression damping
Front Tyre 120/70-ZR17 120/70-ZR17
Rear Tyre 190/55-ZR17 190/55-ZR17
Front Brakes Double disc. ABS. Hydraulic. Four-piston calipers. Double disc. Floating discs. ABS.
Rear Brakes Single disc. ABS. Single disc. ABS.
Wet Weight 199.0 kg (438.7 pounds) βœ“ 206.0 kg (454.2 pounds)
Seat Height 856 mm (33.7 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting. 835 mm (32.9 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Fuel Capacity 17.03 litres (4.50 US gallons) βœ“ 17.00 litres (4.49 US gallons)
Oil Capacity 3.90 litres (4.12 US quarts) 3.60 litres (3.80 US quarts)
Wheelbase 1405 mm (55.3 inches) 1440 mm (56.7 inches)
Ground Clearance β€” 145 mm (5.7 inches)
Engine Oil SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2) SAE 10W-40 / 10W-50 Synthetic 4T (API SN / JASO MA2)
Spark Plugs NGK CR9E /CR9EIA-9 / DPR8EA-9 NGK CR9E /CR9EIA-9 / DPR8EA-9
Battery 12V 12Ah / 14Ah (YTX12-BS / YTX14-BS / YTZ14S) 12V 12Ah / 14Ah (YTX12-BS / YTX14-BS / YTZ14S)
Front Tire Pressure 2.5 bar (36 psi) 2.5 bar (36 psi)
Rear Tire Pressure 2.9 bar (42 psi) 2.9 bar (42 psi)
Share this comparison
Head-to-Head Matchups

Popular Motorcycle Comparisons

Click any matchup below to open a side-by-side motorcycle specifications comparison, including Indian Scout vs Chief, Indian Scout vs Bobber, and popular middleweight rivals.

Category Breakdown

Motorcycle Sport, Touring & Cruiser Differences Comparison

When comparing motorcycles across categories, numbers like horsepower and displacement tell only part of the story. Use this table to compare how sport, touring, cruiser, and naked motorcycles differ in ergonomics, seat height, weight, and real-world use.

Category Riding Posture & Fit Typical Seat Height Wet Weight Range Power & Torque Character Best Real-World Use
Sport Bikes Forward lean, clip-on bars, high rearsets 780 – 835 mm (30.7″ – 32.9″) 165 – 208 kg High-RPM horsepower, aerodynamic fairing, sharp braking Canyon carving, track days, spirited weekend rides
Touring Motorcycles Relaxed upright, full wind protection, spacious saddle 755 – 840 mm (29.7″ – 33.1″) 235 – 380+ kg Broad midrange torque, 20L+ fuel tank, shaft or belt drive Two-up highway travel, cross-country distance comfort
Cruisers & Bobbers Low-slung seat, upright or forward footpegs 649 – 720 mm (25.5″ – 28.3″) 220 – 320 kg Strong low-RPM V-twin or parallel-twin torque, relaxed gearing Easy flat-foot stops, boulevard cruising, relaxed highway miles
Naked & Standards Neutral upright bars, balanced peg placement 775 – 815 mm (30.5″ – 32.1″) 168 – 215 kg Punchy low-to-midrange street torque, wide steering lock Daily commuting, urban agility, all-around versatility
Ergonomics & Sizing

Motorcycle Fit & Seat Height Comparison Guide

Evaluating motorcycle fit requires comparing three specs together: seat height (mm), wet weight (kg), and wheelbase. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder motorcycle is often easier to flat-foot at traffic lights than a wide 750 mm touring saddle.

FAQ

Motorcycle Comparison Questions

What motorcycle specifications should I compare first?

Start a motorcycle specifications comparison with category, displacement (cc), horsepower, torque RPM, wet weight, seat height, and wheelbase. Together these numbers reveal real-world acceleration, low-speed balance, and ergonomic fit.

What are the main differences in a sport vs touring vs cruiser motorcycle comparison?

Sport motorcycles prioritize light weight, high-RPM horsepower, sharp steering geometry, and forward-leaning ergonomics. Cruisers feature low seat heights (650–720 mm), relaxed feet-forward ergonomics, and low-end V-twin or parallel-twin torque. Touring motorcycles combine upright long-distance comfort, wind protection, large fuel capacity (20L+), and high payload capacity.

How do I compare motorcycle fit and seat height for my rider height?

Compare published seat height alongside wet weight and engine configuration. A narrow 790 mm twin-cylinder bike is often easier to flat-foot than a wide 750 mm inline-four or heavy touring model. Compare your inseam against the seat height spec before buying.

How do motorcycle specifications affect a motorcycle insurance comparison?

Insurers price policies largely by engine displacement (cc), category classification (supersport vs standard/cruiser), power-to-weight ratio, ABS availability, and replacement value. A 650cc standard or cruiser typically costs significantly less to insure than a 600cc supersport bike.

What is the difference between Indian Scout vs Chief and Indian Scout vs Bobber?

The Indian Scout uses a liquid-cooled V-twin (1,133 cc, ~100 HP) in a lighter ~256 kg chassis with a 649 mm seat height, whereas the Indian Chief uses an air-cooled Thunderstroke V-twin (1,811–1,890 cc) tuned for massive low-RPM torque in a heavier ~304 kg frame. The Scout Bobber shares the Scout platform with lower suspension, blacked-out bobber styling, and a slightly more forward riding posture.

Can I compare beginner motorcycles side by side here?

Yes. Search any two 125cc, 300cc, 400cc, or 500cc beginner motorcycles in Bike A and Bike B above to compare their seat height, wet weight, power delivery, and fuel capacity side by side.

MotoLibrary
🏠 Home πŸ” All Bikes ⚑ Rider Tools & Simulators 🏍️ My Garage πŸ“‚ Categories βš–οΈ Compare πŸŽ›οΈ Advanced Filter 🎯 Bike Finder 🎬 Videos πŸ“° Blog πŸ“– Glossary ℹ️ About

πŸͺ We use cookies for analytics & ads. Cookie Policy

βš–οΈ Compare (/4):

Comparing Motorcycles

Loading telemetry...
Specification